Karpas Engineering Ltd
-
Unit 13, Leaside Industrial Park, Sedge Grn
Lower Nazeing Ward, eng EN9 2BF - (199) 267-7859
Hours
Chamber Rating
-
Peter Kuell
I used Karpas for some fast prototype to verify the look and feel of a product design before cutting production tooling for multiple parts. They were very knowledgeable on the materials and processes that could be used to achieve a representative sample given the time and aesthetic requirements. The parts that were made arrived quickly and were exactly what we needed and much more representative of the final product than a standard 3D print would have been. I wouldn't hesitate to use them again.
Dec 3rd, 2019 -
Robert K
Aug 19th, 2019
Contact Info
- (199) 267-7859
Questions & Answers
Q What is the phone number for Karpas Engineering Ltd?
A The phone number for Karpas Engineering Ltd is: (199) 267-7859.
Q Where is Karpas Engineering Ltd located?
A Karpas Engineering Ltd is located at Unit 13, Leaside Industrial Park, Sedge Grn, Lower Nazeing Ward, eng EN9 2BF
Q What is the internet address for Karpas Engineering Ltd?
A The website (URL) for Karpas Engineering Ltd is: http://www.karpas.co.uk/
Q What days are Karpas Engineering Ltd open?
A Karpas Engineering Ltd is open:
Sunday: Closed
Monday: 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM
Tuesday: 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM
Wednesday: 8:30 AM - 8:30 AM
Thursday: 8:30 AM - 8:30 AM
Friday: 8:30 AM - 8:30 AM
Saturday: Closed
Q How is Karpas Engineering Ltd rated?
A Karpas Engineering Ltd has a 5.0 Star Rating from 2 reviewers.
Hours
Ratings and Reviews
Karpas Engineering Ltd
Overall Rating
Overall Rating
( 2 Reviews )Peter Kuell on Google
I used Karpas for some fast prototype to verify the look and feel of a product design before cutting production tooling for multiple parts.
They were very knowledgeable on the materials and processes that could be used to achieve a representative sample given the time and aesthetic requirements.
The parts that were made arrived quickly and were exactly what we needed and much more representative of the final product than a standard 3D print would have been.
I wouldn't hesitate to use them again.
Robert K on Google