LCF Law
Hours
Chamber Rating
-
Chris Carr
Good communication, professional and friendly.
Mar 22nd, 2023 -
Katie Davison
I was very satisfied with my experience at LCF Law. Having a new business I was guided through a contractual process with professionalism, ease and a very down to earth, approachable manner. I wouldnt hesitate to recommend the firm and would be very happy to work with them again in the future.
Mar 16th, 2023 -
john L
This is the first time I used LCF Law. The service I received was exemplary and I was able to proceed with my project much more quickly than anyone expected
Feb 21st, 2023 -
Przemek Duklas
I have had the pleasure to work with LCF four times already and I must say that the service I received has always been second to none. Fantastic communication, always clear about pricing, extremely professional and always ready to help, even out of hours which is exceptional. Will definitely use their service again.
Aug 11th, 2022 -
Pete O'Sullivan
We appointed LCF Law (Leeds) to offer advice on a situation we have ongoing with Trading 212, Financial Conduct Authority and Financial Ombudsman Service. LCF charged us 3900 inc Vat. Upon receiving the advice we noticed the evidence we relied upon going forward had been excluded from being mentioned and subsequently received no reasoning as to its exclusion. We complained to LCF about this untoward action with no acceptable explanation being offered. We instructed LCF to send out solicitors letters to both Trading 212 and FOS, only to be point blank refused this request. We had managing partner Simon Stell take on the required internal investigation. In concluding, Simon Stell misrepresented the clear and evidenced facts in order to try and avoid further scrutiny into their operation. A bit like marking your own homework with these internal investigations. I have emails accusing LCFs Charles Abraham of refusing my further instructions to send out solicitors letters, this claim has never been contested, however Simon Stell claims it never happened..why was the claim never contested then Simon?? LCF have evidenced to me they are dishonest in their practice. To pay a substantial amount of money for advice and then have your further instructions refused is of wrongful action by LCF. Taking away the option to progress away from the clients is no use to anyone. It looks like the influence of FCA/FOS is greater than the clients needs. When lawyers blatantly misrepresent facts and evidence how dishonest they are, they should be struck off. Lets see if the Solicitors Regulation Authority and Legal Ombudsman do right by the consumers. I doubt it as LCF are doing this in 2023. We instruct lawyers to adequately advise and operate to our instructions and we end up using substantial amounts of time having to correct their unlawful actions. Shocking state of affairs. We await Simons response. Please evidence to us how you know Charles Abraham did Not refuse my instructions during our phone call on 30th January 23? Listen to the phone call Simon or check the emails i sent Charles accusing him of his refusal to take my instructions. Its not very often i want to make use of a lawyer, but when i do, i prefer they work with due care, diligence and honesty with intentions to assist with my problems.not add to them. **UPDATE** 21/04/23 Currently awaiting a decision by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). After noticing SRA reviews on Trustpilot being 100% bad, Im obviously not hopeful they are operating in the interests of consumers. When the SRA wages are being paid by the firms were complaining about, how is this not a conflict of interest?? Lets take a hit with the reviews, but least our wages are covered.. Another limited company killing a cash cow, at the sole expense of the consumers. Is there any wonder these firms enact such conduct on unsuspecting people when the regulation is fake. We emailed LCF Law 2 days ago requesting a copy of a conversation i had with the lawyer, theyve not even bothered responding. LCF did not do their job. And when challenged, they start telling lies to try avoid scrutiny. Simon Stell tells lies, and i have the evidence to prove this. Ive never been to court against a law firm before. Well have to see if a judge takes a different view to the regulator.
Apr 24th, 2023
Contact Info
- (113) 244-0876
Questions & Answers
Q What is the phone number for LCF Law?
A The phone number for LCF Law is: (113) 244-0876.
Q Where is LCF Law located?
A LCF Law is located at 33 Park Pl, Leeds, eng LS1 2RY
Q What is the internet address for LCF Law?
A The website (URL) for LCF Law is: https://lcf.co.uk/contact-us/solicitors-leeds/
Q What days are LCF Law open?
A LCF Law is open:
Tuesday: 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM
Wednesday: 8:30 AM - 8:30 AM
Thursday: 8:30 AM - 8:30 AM
Friday: 8:30 AM - 8:30 AM
Saturday: Closed
Sunday: Closed
Monday: 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM
Q How is LCF Law rated?
A LCF Law has a 4.2 Star Rating from 17 reviewers.
Hours
Ratings and Reviews
LCF Law
Overall Rating
Overall Rating
( 17 Reviews )Chris Carr on Google
Good communication, professional and friendly.
Katie Davison on Google
I was very satisfied with my experience at LCF Law. Having a new business I was guided through a contractual process with professionalism, ease and a very down to earth, approachable manner.
I wouldnt hesitate to recommend the firm and would be very happy to work with them again in the future.
john L on Google
This is the first time I used LCF Law. The service I received was exemplary and I was able to proceed with my project much more quickly than anyone expected
Przemek Duklas on Google
I have had the pleasure to work with LCF four times already and I must say that the service I received has always been second to none. Fantastic communication, always clear about pricing, extremely professional and always ready to help, even out of hours which is exceptional. Will definitely use their service again.
Pete O'Sullivan on Google
We appointed LCF Law (Leeds) to offer advice on a situation we have ongoing with Trading 212, Financial Conduct Authority and Financial Ombudsman Service.
LCF charged us 3900 inc Vat.
Upon receiving the advice we noticed the evidence we relied upon going forward had been excluded from being mentioned and subsequently received no reasoning as to its exclusion.
We complained to LCF about this untoward action with no acceptable explanation being offered.
We instructed LCF to send out solicitors letters to both Trading 212 and FOS, only to be point blank refused this request.
We had managing partner Simon Stell take on the required internal investigation. In concluding, Simon Stell misrepresented the clear and evidenced facts in order to try and avoid further scrutiny into their operation. A bit like marking your own homework with these internal investigations.
I have emails accusing LCFs Charles Abraham of refusing my further instructions to send out solicitors letters, this claim has never been contested, however Simon Stell claims it never happened..why was the claim never contested then Simon??
LCF have evidenced to me they are dishonest in their practice.
To pay a substantial amount of money for advice and then have your further instructions refused is of wrongful action by LCF.
Taking away the option to progress away from the clients is no use to anyone.
It looks like the influence of FCA/FOS is greater than the clients needs.
When lawyers blatantly misrepresent facts and evidence how dishonest they are, they should be struck off.
Lets see if the Solicitors Regulation Authority and Legal Ombudsman do right by the consumers.
I doubt it as LCF are doing this in 2023.
We instruct lawyers to adequately advise and operate to our instructions and we end up using substantial amounts of time having to correct their unlawful actions.
Shocking state of affairs.
We await Simons response. Please evidence to us how you know Charles Abraham did Not refuse my instructions during our phone call on 30th January 23?
Listen to the phone call Simon or check the emails i sent Charles accusing him of his refusal to take my instructions.
Its not very often i want to make use of a lawyer, but when i do, i prefer they work with due care, diligence and honesty with intentions to assist with my problems.not add to them.
**UPDATE** 21/04/23
Currently awaiting a decision by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).
After noticing SRA reviews on Trustpilot being 100% bad, Im obviously not hopeful they are operating in the interests of consumers.
When the SRA wages are being paid by the firms were complaining about, how is this not a conflict of interest??
Lets take a hit with the reviews, but least our wages are covered..
Another limited company killing a cash cow, at the sole expense of the consumers.
Is there any wonder these firms enact such conduct on unsuspecting people when the regulation is fake.
We emailed LCF Law 2 days ago requesting a copy of a conversation i had with the lawyer, theyve not even bothered responding.
LCF did not do their job. And when challenged, they start telling lies to try avoid scrutiny.
Simon Stell tells lies, and i have the evidence to prove this.
Ive never been to court against a law firm before. Well have to see if a judge takes a different view to the regulator.