Hove Town Hall
Hours
Chamber Rating
-
Eileen Bisshopp
Time they reopened!! useless help on. Phone and their links
Jan 21st, 2022 -
Simon GB
The normal below average council service has actually got worse. Offices not open due to Covid...and no answer on the phone, so what are we expected to do. Ive an idea once the council tax bill comes through lets keep them waiting, no taxation without representation. If the service is not satisfactory why should we pay for it?
Jan 7th, 2022 -
Drink Cider
Jul 23rd, 2021 -
rupert taylor
1 in 4 family court cases not the biological father in Brighton The deliberate or reckless making of a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth would usually be so inherently serious that nothing short of an order for committal to prison would be sufficient. The Court made specific reference to contempt of court where a claimant sought to support a spurious or exaggerated claim, a lay witness seeking to provide evidence in support of such a claim, or an expert witness putting forward an opinion without an honest belief in its truth. Where it was an expert making the false statement, the fact that he or she was acting corruptly and made the relevant false statement for reward would make the case even more serious. It would be a serious contempt of court even if the expert witness acted from an indirect financial motive the court gave examples such as a desire to obtain more work from a particular solicitor. It would still be a serious contempt if there was no financial motivation. Experts owe an overriding duty to the court that supersedes their duty to whoever is instructing them. Contempt by an expert undermines the administration of justice. It would therefore always be serious. It did not matter that the deliberate of reckless false statement was identified at an early stage and it did not matter that the deliberate or reckless false statement did not affect the outcome of the litigation. There is a great deal of trust placed on a witness. Putting forward a false statement, not caring about the truth, was usually almost as serious a contempt as telling a deliberate lie.
Jul 1st, 2021 -
Julia Lowe
Alright
Apr 2nd, 2020
Contact Info
- (127) 329-0000
Questions & Answers
Q What is the phone number for Hove Town Hall?
A The phone number for Hove Town Hall is: (127) 329-0000.
Q Where is Hove Town Hall located?
A Hove Town Hall is located at Norton Rd, Brighton, eng BN3 3BQ
Q What days are Hove Town Hall open?
A Hove Town Hall is open:
Tuesday: 9:00 AM - 4:30 PM
Wednesday: 9:00 AM - 9:00 AM
Thursday: 9:00 AM - 9:00 AM
Friday: 9:00 AM - 9:00 AM
Saturday: 9:00 AM - 9:00 AM
Sunday: Closed
Monday: 9:00 AM - 4:30 PM
Q How is Hove Town Hall rated?
A Hove Town Hall has a 3.4 Star Rating from 23 reviewers.
Hours
Ratings and Reviews
Hove Town Hall
Overall Rating
Overall Rating
( 23 Reviews )Eileen Bisshopp on Google
Time they reopened!! useless help on. Phone and their links
Simon GB on Google
The normal below average council service has actually got worse.
Offices not open due to Covid...and no answer on the phone, so what are we expected to do.
Ive an idea once the council tax bill comes through lets keep them waiting, no taxation without representation.
If the service is not satisfactory why should we pay for it?
Drink Cider on Google
rupert taylor on Google
1 in 4 family court cases not the biological father in Brighton
The deliberate or reckless making of a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth would usually be so inherently serious that nothing short of an order for committal to prison would be sufficient.
The Court made specific reference to contempt of court where a claimant sought to support a spurious or exaggerated claim, a lay witness seeking to provide evidence in support of such a claim, or an expert witness putting forward an opinion without an honest belief in its truth.
Where it was an expert making the false statement, the fact that he or she was acting corruptly and made the relevant false statement for reward would make the case even more serious. It would be a serious contempt of court even if the expert witness acted from an indirect financial motive the court gave examples such as a desire to obtain more work from a particular solicitor. It would still be a serious contempt if there was no financial motivation.
Experts owe an overriding duty to the court that supersedes their duty to whoever is instructing them. Contempt by an expert undermines the administration of justice. It would therefore always be serious. It did not matter that the deliberate of reckless false statement was identified at an early stage and it did not matter that the deliberate or reckless false statement did not affect the outcome of the litigation.
There is a great deal of trust placed on a witness. Putting forward a false statement, not caring about the truth, was usually almost as serious a contempt as telling a deliberate lie.
Julia Lowe on Google
Alright